Francisco Comesana vs Federico Cina Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

What insights can we glean from the second serve performance in the last half-year? Cina has secured 45.86% of points on their second serve, while Comesana edges slightly ahead, capturing 47.91%. These figures often serve as a crystal ball, hinting at who might have the upper hand in the upcoming match.

Focusing on the return statistics, Cina emerges as the stronger contender by winning 49.05% of the points on their opponent's second serve, compared to Comesana’s 46.16%. When dissecting first serve returns, Cina again comes out on top with 28.67% versus Comesana's 27.1%. Such percentages carry substantial weight in discerning the predicted favorite of this head-to-head battle.

In moments of crisis, how do these athletes fare? Cina has managed to save a respectable 55.16% of breakpoints in recent form, while Comesana narrowly surpasses this with 56.58%. Such data might steer your betting instincts as the match intensifies. A glance at their overall performance over the past year shows Cina boasting a 64.15% success rate in matches (34 wins to 19 losses), while Comesana trails slightly with 61.43% (43 wins to 27 losses), shedding light on the broader competitive outlook.

Diving into surface preferences, Cina shines brightest on Hard courts, clinching 62% of matches (28 wins to 17 losses). On the other hand, Comesana excels on Clay with a 66% win rate (252 wins to 132 losses), yet struggles on Indoor Hard surfaces, with no victories to show from one match played. The level of play each competitor frequently engages in also varies; Cina predominantly competes in Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K tournaments, achieving a 75% win rate (24 wins to 8 losses), while Comesana plays mainly at the Challengers level with a 68.18% success (30 wins to 14 losses). The caliber of opponents they've faced over the past year also varies, with Cina's average opponent ranking at 349.53 compared to Comesana's 201.17, offering a different perspective on their competitive journeys.

How do they perform in tense deciding sets? Cina claims victory in 64% of such scenarios, yet Comesana outperforms with a 72% win rate, a statistic that could sway live predictions. Let's not ignore break point conversion rates either: Cina converts 39.34% of break chances, while Comesana does so 31.63% of the time, offering an edge in predicting pivotal in-game moments. As the match looms, these granular stats collectively sway the pendulum slightly in favor of Comesana, positioning him as the probable victor based on current form and nuanced performance metrics.